Skip to content
PSHRA logo
  • Job Board
  • Store
  • Login Welcome, My AccountLog Out
  • Become a Member
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Agency Membership
    • Chapters
      • Establish a Chapter
      • Chapter Directory
    • Awards
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Community Forum
  • News & Resources
    • Public Eye Magazine
    • Public Eye Podcast
    • News
    • Research & Reports
    • Webinar Library
    • Assessments
  • Events & Engagements
    • Annual Conference
    • Event Calendar
  • Education & Certification
    • Certification
    • Courses
    • Webinars
    • Fellowships
  • Job Board
  • Store
  • Login Welcome, My AccountLog Out
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Youtube
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Agency Membership
    • Chapters
      • Establish a Chapter
      • Chapter Directory
    • Awards
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Community Forum
  • News & Resources
    • Public Eye Magazine
    • Public Eye Podcast
    • News
    • Research & Reports
    • Webinar Library
    • Assessments
  • Events & Engagements
    • Annual Conference
    • Event Calendar
  • Education & Certification
    • Certification
    • Courses
    • Webinars
    • Fellowships

January 2023

A Battle Over Abortion Services

New VA Policy Faces Legal Challenges Ahead

Back to Posts
roe-v-wade
Back to Posts
  1. Home
  2. A Battle Over Abortion Services
SHARE:

In what could be the first of numerous legal challenges to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) new abortion access policy, a nurse practitioner employed by the VA is suing the agency, claiming the policy violates her religious beliefs.

Filed on behalf of Stephanie Carter, MSN, RN, an Army veteran and nurse practitioner at the Olin E. Teague Veterans’ Center in Temple, Texas, the suit alleges that Carter’s “sincerely held religious beliefs prohibit her from offering abortion services and providing counseling required by application” of the agency’s policy. Carter also contends that the policy violates her rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and that the VA has no process in place to receive religious accommodation requests from healthcare workers, according to Becker’s Hospital Review.

The lawsuit requests a court to rule that the policy is illegal, and to block the VA from enforcing it at the center where Carter works. The VA disputed this claim, saying it provided VA healthcare employees with information on how to file exemption requests through their supervisors, Becker’s reports.

“From the moment VA announced this new rule, Secretary [Denis] McDonough has made clear to all employees that their religious beliefs are protected here at VA,” a Veteran Affairs spokesperson told Becker’s. “While we cannot comment on ongoing litigation, VA does provide accommodation for VA employees who wish to opt out of providing abortion counseling or services. We are currently honoring exemption requests that come through VA supervisors.”

The VA announced the new policy in September 2022, not quite two months after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion nationwide.

Per an interim final rule the department submitted to the Federal Register, the VA will provide access to abortion counseling and, in some cases, abortions to pregnant veterans and VA beneficiaries. Specifically, the VA will provide access to abortions when the life or health of the pregnant veteran would be endangered if the pregnancy were carried to term, or when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest. VA beneficiaries enrolled in CHAMPVA will also have access to this care.

In a September statement describing the new policy’s implementation as “a patient safety decision,” Secretary McDonough said that “pregnant veterans and VA beneficiaries deserve to have access to world-class reproductive care when they need it most. That’s what our nation owes them, and that’s what we at VA will deliver.”

Allowing for Exceptions

The abortion access policy the VA recently adopted resembles the one in place at Department of Defense (DoD) medical facilities, said Mary Kuntz, a Washington, D.C.-based partner at employment law firm Kalijarvi, Chuzi, Newman & Fitch.

What’s new, she said, is the VA policy that seeks to allow exceptions for religious objections by medical staff at VA facilities.

“This, of course, is intended to be compliant with the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and address First Amendment concerns,” Kuntz told HR News.  “However, it appears that the VA has failed to provide a policy for employees to follow in seeking religious waivers or a process for determining the outcome of these.”

The Carter claim takes aim at the VA’s abortion policy itself “at length,” she continued, “filling the facts with a review of the history of abortion rules at the VA and the effect of [Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization]. Nevertheless, the causes of action allege nothing about the policy on abortion, but rather allege violations of the RFRA and the First Amendment.”

The plaintiff in this case has no standing to challenge an agency policy through the courts, according to Kuntz, adding that Carter and her attorneys have instead used Carter’s private right of action under RFRA and the First Amendment to mount a collateral attack on the VA’s new rule.

“The interesting question, then, is not whether other challenges to the VA’s new rule on abortion services will come—surely the answer to that is yes—but whether the courts will allow a case alleging violations of the RFRA and the First Amendment to be used to mount a collateral attack on an agency’s policy.”

Keeping the Policy in Place

Carter is the first VA employee to file a lawsuit related to the organization’s new abortion access policy. But, as Kuntz pointed out, the agency can count on more legal challenges in the days ahead.

For example, a group of 15 Republican attorneys general has made clear that it plans to fight the VA’s policy in court, sending a Nov. 17 letter to McDonough criticizing the administration’s “lawless and hasty executive actions taken at the behest of its political base” concerning abortion, as Military Times reported at the time.

The coalition, which included officials from states such as Arizona, Florida, Georgia and West Virginia, warned McDonough that “we will not allow you to use this rule to erect a regime of elective abortions” in defiance of state laws.

“And we will enforce our duly enacted state laws and hold you accountable for violations of federal law,” the group wrote, warning that those who perform abortions based on the new rule and in violation of state or federal laws “do so at their own risk.”

Less than one month after that letter surfaced, Republican members of the House and Senate introduced a resolution that would reverse the VA’s abortion policy, according to a Military.com report.

Introducing the resolution under the Congressional Review Act, Republican senators could force a vote on the measure even though Democrats control the chamber. And, while not enough time was left to force a vote this most recent congressional session, the resolution’s lead Senate sponsor, Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, plans to reintroduce it in 2023 and collect signatures for the discharge then, Military.com’s Rebecca Kheel wrote.

For its part, the Department of Veterans Affairs has thus far stood firm, and has declared its intention to keep its new abortion policy in place.

The agency aims to remain “committed to providing veterans the full range of reproductive health services,” read a VA statement issued in response to the aforementioned attorneys general letter, “to ensure their health and well-being.”

PUBLISHED DATE

01 January 2023

AUTHOR
Mark McGraw, PSHRA

Category

February 2023 Issue • HR News Article

Subscribe

Subscribe to the HR Bulletin
Subscribe

Related Posts

View more

September 2023

Elected Officials Press OMB to Increase Federal In-Office Requirements


Learn More

September 2023

Tomorrow’s Workforce Coalition to Deliver Sign-On Letter to Congress


Learn More

September 2023

Research: Defense Community Struggling to Find Tech Talent


Learn More

Get started.

Public sector human resources is a challenging and essential profession. Don’t miss out on the knowledge, resources, and connections you need.

Contact Us
PSHRA logo

Public Sector HR Association
1617 Duke Street
Alexandria, VA 22314

Phone: (703) 549-7100

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Youtube

About PSHRA

  • Leadership
  • Strategic Plan
  • Partner With Us
  • Press Releases

Support

  • Contact

Website

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
© 2023 Public Sector HR Association
Scroll To Top
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
Save & Accept